Submit your own Open Science case
The submission form requires the following information, if you apply for the Lighthouse Award yourself:
| Information | Description |
|---|---|
| Contact information | |
| Case Study Title | The case study should be no more than 800 words in total. |
| Open Science objectives/practices | Please specify one or more of the Open Science objectives/practices addressed in your case study |
| Introduction | Please provide a brief description of the open practice(s) and tool(s) used, as well as the context in which the open practices were used. |
| Motivation | Why did you use the Open Science practice(s) (e.g., what are the benefits and for whom) |
| Lessons learned | Please reflect on the barriers or challenges and/or supporting factors (e.g., supervisor, workshops, infrastructure, funding) encountered. |
Additional information:
- How much extra time did the open practices require?
- URLs, references and further information
- word count (excluding title, URLs, references and further information)
Nominate a colleague
The submission form requires the following information, if you nominate a colleague:
| Information | Description |
|---|---|
| Your contact information | Your nomination is anonymous |
| The contact information of the nominee | After your nomination, we will contact the nominee to ask for permission. |
| Motivation | Please describe why you think that your colleague deserves the first Open Science Lighthouse Award. |
The description should be no more than 500 words in total. You can include information on the Open Science objectives/practices that your colleague advances, how they inspire you and others to open your research or how your colleague and others are benefiting from their open research practices.